Entrar
Brazuca News

A informação que conecta brasileiros e latinos nos EUA

Voltar
Educação

Escola precisa de autorização escrita dos pais para aplicar pesquisa sobre saúde mental, diz Departamento de Educação

Carta federal de 26 de agosto diz que questionário aplicado por professor ou conselheiro conta como obrigatório, mesmo quando a escola chama de voluntário — e que o formulário de recusa não substitui a assinatura dos pais.

Redação Brazuca News 30 de August de 2026, 11:23 1 visualizações
Compartilhar
Escola precisa de autorização escrita dos pais para aplicar pesquisa sobre saúde mental, diz Departamento de Educação
Foto: Kindel Media / Pexels License

The U.S. Department of Education has warned school systems that receive federal funding that they need written parental authorization before administering questionnaires about students' mental health, religious beliefs, political opinions, or sexual behavior. The guidance was issued on August 26 in a letter from the Student Privacy Policy Office (SPPO) addressed to state school administrators and school districts at the start of the school year.

The central point of the document is a shift in interpretation. A questionnaire administered by a teacher, counselor, or other school employee counts as "mandatory," even when the school presents participation as voluntary. And, if it counts as mandatory, the strictest rule applies: signed authorization beforehand, and not just the option to refuse afterward.

What the letter determines

The SPPO bases its guidance on two federal laws that apply to any public school that receives funding from the American government: FERPA, which deals with school records, and PPRA, which deals with research and assessments applied in the classroom.

According to the PPRA (Program for the Prevention of Related Crimes), the school needs prior written consent from parents when the questionnaire reveals protected information about the student or family. This includes political beliefs, mental or psychological health, sexual behavior and attitudes, and religious beliefs, among other sensitive topics.

The letter also reinforces that parents can request to review their child's school records and the material used in class. Frank Miller, director of the student privacy office, wrote that parents know what is best for their children and that the department continues to see schools adopting policies that leave the family out.

Why volunteering stopped being valid.

The department argues that children rarely feel free to say no when the person handing out the form is the authority figure in the classroom. Peer pressure, fear of being left out, and a desire to please the teacher all influence the decision to respond, according to guidance reported by K-12 Dive, a publication specializing in basic education.

In practice, this overturns a common arrangement in the districts: the school notifies parents at the beginning of the year, provides a refusal form, and treats those who did not return the form as authorized. This model, the letter says, does not meet the requirements of the law.

What changes in the day-to-day life of the district?

Schools that administer mental health screenings, well-being surveys, or school climate surveys will now require explicit consent from the family. Districts should also allow parents to read the survey content before the student responds, not after.

According to the K-12 Dive, the department extends the reasoning to documents that the school maintains about the student, including internal support plans, even when the district does not classify them as educational records.

What's at stake for those who fail to comply?

The letter notes that non-compliance with both laws could cost the state or district federal funding. The department has already opened statewide investigations and concluded that the California Department of Education violated FERPA by keeping gender support plans out of the reach of parents.

Losing federal funding is an extreme and rare scenario, but the immediate effect is different: districts are now reviewing contracts with research companies, socio-emotional screening schedules, and the wording of the forms that go into the backpacks.

What immigrant families need to consider.

For newcomers, the bottleneck is usually the language. The beginning-of-year package comes in English, with several similar pages, and the signature ends up being automatic. Federal guidelines change the importance of this document: it becomes the document that authorizes, or blocks, questions about mental health and family routines.

Before signing, it's worth asking the school office for a copy of the questionnaire that will be used, asking who will read the answers and for how long they will be kept. Public schools usually offer an interpreter for meetings with families, and this request can be made at the office itself.

What remains valid according to FERPA

FERPA guarantees parents the right to view their child's school records and to request corrections when something is wrong, from address issues to disciplinary notes. This right arises from the student's enrollment in a school that receives federal funding.

What comes next?

States and districts need to adapt notices and forms for the school year that has begun. Since the letter is a departmental guideline, and not a new law, practical enforcement is likely to occur on two fronts: in complaints that families send to the student privacy office and in investigations that the department itself opens against state education offices.

Where to confirm

  • U.S. Department of Education, official statement dated August 26, 2026: www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/us-department-of-education-reminds-schools-of-their-obligation-comply-parental-rights-law
  • K-12 Dive, news report from August 27, 2026: www.k12dive.com/news/mental-health-screenings-surveys-require-parental-consent-education-depar/829020/

Comentários

Faça login para comentar

Entrar

Seja o primeiro a comentar!